Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better? ASML Holding N.V. or Analog Devices, Inc.

ASML vs. Analog Devices: SG&A Cost Management Showdown

__timestampASML Holding N.V.Analog Devices, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 2014318672000454676000
Thursday, January 1, 2015345700000478972000
Friday, January 1, 2016374800000461438000
Sunday, January 1, 2017416600000691046000
Monday, January 1, 2018488000000695937000
Tuesday, January 1, 2019520500000648094000
Wednesday, January 1, 2020544900000659923000
Friday, January 1, 2021725600000915418000
Saturday, January 1, 20229096000001266175000
Sunday, January 1, 202311132000001273584000
Monday, January 1, 202411657000001068640000
Loading chart...

Infusing magic into the data realm

Optimizing SG&A Costs: A Tale of Two Giants

In the competitive landscape of semiconductor and technology industries, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for maintaining profitability. ASML Holding N.V. and Analog Devices, Inc. have been at the forefront of this challenge since 2014. Over the past decade, Analog Devices has consistently reported higher SG&A expenses, peaking at approximately $1.27 billion in 2023, a 180% increase from 2014. In contrast, ASML's SG&A expenses grew by 250% over the same period, reaching around $1.11 billion in 2023. This trend highlights ASML's aggressive expansion strategy, while Analog Devices maintains a steady growth trajectory. Notably, 2024 data for ASML is missing, leaving room for speculation on their future cost management strategies. As these industry leaders continue to innovate, their ability to optimize SG&A costs will be pivotal in sustaining their competitive edge.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025