Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better? Arista Networks, Inc. or Cadence Design Systems, Inc.

SG&A Cost Management: Arista vs. Cadence

__timestampArista Networks, Inc.Cadence Design Systems, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 2014117669000513307000
Thursday, January 1, 2015184804000512414000
Friday, January 1, 2016206126000520300000
Sunday, January 1, 2017241903000553342000
Monday, January 1, 2018252562000573075000
Tuesday, January 1, 2019275805000621479000
Wednesday, January 1, 2020295608000670885000
Friday, January 1, 2021369288000749280000
Saturday, January 1, 2022420196000846340000
Sunday, January 1, 2023518114000920649000
Monday, January 1, 20245499700001039766000
Loading chart...

In pursuit of knowledge

Optimizing SG&A Costs: A Tale of Two Tech Giants

In the competitive landscape of technology, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for maintaining profitability. Arista Networks, Inc. and Cadence Design Systems, Inc. have been at the forefront of this financial balancing act since 2014. Over the past decade, Cadence Design Systems has consistently spent more on SG&A, with expenses peaking at approximately 920 million in 2023, a 79% increase from 2014. In contrast, Arista Networks has shown a more conservative growth in SG&A expenses, rising by 340% to around 518 million in the same period. This strategic cost management has allowed Arista to maintain a leaner operational model. As the tech industry continues to evolve, the ability to optimize SG&A costs will remain a key differentiator for these companies.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025