Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better? Apple Inc. or ASML Holding N.V.

Apple vs. ASML: A Decade of SG&A Strategies

__timestampASML Holding N.V.Apple Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 201431867200011993000000
Thursday, January 1, 201534570000014329000000
Friday, January 1, 201637480000014194000000
Sunday, January 1, 201741660000015261000000
Monday, January 1, 201848800000016705000000
Tuesday, January 1, 201952050000018245000000
Wednesday, January 1, 202054490000019916000000
Friday, January 1, 202172560000021973000000
Saturday, January 1, 202290960000025094000000
Sunday, January 1, 2023111320000024932000000
Monday, January 1, 2024116570000026097000000
Loading chart...

Data in motion

Optimizing SG&A Costs: A Tale of Two Giants

In the competitive world of technology, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for maintaining profitability. Over the past decade, Apple Inc. and ASML Holding N.V. have demonstrated contrasting approaches to SG&A optimization.

A Decade of Financial Strategy

From 2014 to 2023, Apple Inc. consistently reported higher SG&A expenses, peaking at approximately $26 billion in 2023. This reflects a strategic investment in marketing and administrative capabilities, aligning with its expansive product ecosystem. In contrast, ASML Holding N.V. maintained a leaner SG&A structure, with expenses growing from $318 million in 2014 to $1.1 billion in 2023. This represents a more than threefold increase, yet it remains a fraction of Apple's expenditure.

Strategic Implications

Apple's approach suggests a focus on brand dominance and market penetration, while ASML's strategy highlights efficiency and targeted growth. As these tech titans continue to evolve, their SG&A strategies will remain pivotal in shaping their financial narratives.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025