Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better? Analog Devices, Inc. or NetApp, Inc.

SG&A Cost Management: Analog Devices vs. NetApp

__timestampAnalog Devices, Inc.NetApp, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 20144546760002179200000
Thursday, January 1, 20154789720002197400000
Friday, January 1, 20164614380002099000000
Sunday, January 1, 20176910460001904000000
Monday, January 1, 20186959370002009000000
Tuesday, January 1, 20196480940001935000000
Wednesday, January 1, 20206599230001848000000
Friday, January 1, 20219154180002001000000
Saturday, January 1, 202212661750002136000000
Sunday, January 1, 202312735840002094000000
Monday, January 1, 202410686400002136000000
Loading chart...

Unleashing the power of data

Optimizing SG&A Costs: A Tale of Two Giants

In the competitive landscape of technology, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for profitability. Over the past decade, Analog Devices, Inc. and NetApp, Inc. have showcased contrasting strategies in this domain. From 2014 to 2024, Analog Devices, Inc. has seen a 135% increase in SG&A expenses, peaking in 2023. In contrast, NetApp, Inc. maintained a relatively stable SG&A cost, with a mere 2% fluctuation over the same period. This stability suggests a disciplined approach to cost management, potentially giving NetApp a competitive edge in operational efficiency. However, Analog Devices' rising expenses could indicate strategic investments in growth and innovation. As we move forward, the ability to balance cost optimization with strategic investments will be pivotal for these industry leaders. The data reveals a fascinating narrative of financial strategy and corporate foresight.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025