Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better? Analog Devices, Inc. or Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.

SG&A Cost Management: Analog Devices vs. Fidelity National

__timestampAnalog Devices, Inc.Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 2014454676000810500000
Thursday, January 1, 20154789720001102800000
Friday, January 1, 20164614380001710000000
Sunday, January 1, 20176910460001442000000
Monday, January 1, 20186959370001301000000
Tuesday, January 1, 20196480940002667000000
Wednesday, January 1, 20206599230003516000000
Friday, January 1, 20219154180003938000000
Saturday, January 1, 202212661750004118000000
Sunday, January 1, 202312735840002096000000
Monday, January 1, 202410686400002185000000
Loading chart...

Data in motion

Optimizing SG&A Costs: A Tale of Two Giants

In the competitive landscape of corporate America, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for profitability. This analysis pits Analog Devices, Inc. against Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. over a decade, from 2014 to 2023, to see who optimizes these costs better.

Analog Devices, Inc. has shown a steady increase in SG&A expenses, peaking at approximately $1.27 billion in 2023, a 180% rise from 2014. Meanwhile, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. experienced a more volatile trajectory, with expenses soaring to over $4 billion in 2022 before dropping to around $2.1 billion in 2023.

While Analog Devices maintains a consistent upward trend, Fidelity's fluctuations suggest a more dynamic approach to cost management. Missing data for 2024 for Fidelity indicates potential changes in strategy. This comparison highlights the diverse strategies companies employ to manage operational costs effectively.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025