Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better? Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. or Gen Digital Inc.

AMD vs. Gen Digital: A Decade of SG&A Cost Strategies

__timestampAdvanced Micro Devices, Inc.Gen Digital Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 20145990000002880000000
Thursday, January 1, 20154820000002702000000
Friday, January 1, 20164660000001587000000
Sunday, January 1, 20175160000002023000000
Monday, January 1, 20185620000002171000000
Tuesday, January 1, 20197500000001940000000
Wednesday, January 1, 20209950000001069000000
Friday, January 1, 20211448000000791000000
Saturday, January 1, 202223360000001014000000
Sunday, January 1, 20232352000000968000000
Monday, January 1, 202427830000001337000000
Loading chart...

Unleashing the power of data

Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better?

In the competitive landscape of technology giants, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for maintaining profitability. Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. (AMD) and Gen Digital Inc. have shown contrasting strategies over the past decade. From 2014 to 2023, AMD's SG&A expenses surged by nearly 293%, reflecting its aggressive growth and expansion strategy. In contrast, Gen Digital Inc. managed to reduce its SG&A costs by approximately 66% during the same period, showcasing a more conservative and cost-efficient approach.

A Decade of Financial Strategy

AMD's expenses peaked in 2023, while Gen Digital Inc. achieved its lowest in 2021, indicating a strategic shift. The data suggests that while AMD focuses on scaling, Gen Digital Inc. prioritizes cost optimization. This divergence highlights the varied paths companies can take to achieve financial success in the tech industry.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025