Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better? Adobe Inc. or Fortive Corporation

Adobe vs. Fortive: SG&A Cost Strategies Unveiled

__timestampAdobe Inc.Fortive Corporation
Wednesday, January 1, 201422151400001416300000
Thursday, January 1, 201522151610001347900000
Friday, January 1, 201624879070001402000000
Sunday, January 1, 201728222980001537600000
Monday, January 1, 201833657270001728600000
Tuesday, January 1, 201941249840002219500000
Wednesday, January 1, 202045590000001748400000
Friday, January 1, 202154060000001839500000
Saturday, January 1, 202261870000001956600000
Sunday, January 1, 202367640000002062600000
Monday, January 1, 202472930000002173500000
Loading chart...

Data in motion

Optimizing SG&A: A Tale of Two Giants

In the competitive landscape of corporate America, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for profitability. Adobe Inc. and Fortive Corporation, two industry leaders, have shown distinct strategies in this regard. From 2014 to 2023, Adobe's SG&A expenses surged by over 230%, reflecting its aggressive growth and expansion strategy. In contrast, Fortive's expenses grew by approximately 45%, indicating a more conservative approach.

Adobe's significant increase in SG&A costs, peaking at $7.3 billion in 2024, suggests a focus on scaling operations and investing in innovation. Meanwhile, Fortive's steadier rise, with expenses reaching around $2.1 billion in 2023, highlights its emphasis on efficiency and cost control. This divergence in strategies offers a fascinating insight into how these corporations navigate their financial landscapes. As we look to the future, the question remains: which approach will yield greater long-term success?

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025