__timestamp | Jacobs Engineering Group Inc. | Xylem Inc. |
---|---|---|
Wednesday, January 1, 2014 | 2073784000 | 1513000000 |
Thursday, January 1, 2015 | 1968338000 | 1404000000 |
Friday, January 1, 2016 | 1767831000 | 1461000000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2017 | 1772252000 | 1851000000 |
Monday, January 1, 2018 | 2828370000 | 2026000000 |
Tuesday, January 1, 2019 | 2477028000 | 2046000000 |
Wednesday, January 1, 2020 | 2586668000 | 1830000000 |
Friday, January 1, 2021 | 3043772000 | 1975000000 |
Saturday, January 1, 2022 | 3327040000 | 2084000000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2023 | 3473315000 | 2717000000 |
Monday, January 1, 2024 | 2832756000 |
Unveiling the hidden dimensions of data
In the competitive landscape of industrial giants, Xylem Inc. and Jacobs Engineering Group Inc. have been vying for supremacy in gross profit generation over the past decade. From 2014 to 2023, Jacobs Engineering consistently outperformed Xylem, boasting an average gross profit approximately 35% higher. Notably, in 2023, Jacobs reached a peak with a gross profit of $3.47 billion, while Xylem trailed with $2.72 billion. However, Xylem showed remarkable growth, especially from 2017 onwards, narrowing the gap significantly. The data reveals a compelling narrative of resilience and strategic growth, with Xylem's gross profit increasing by nearly 80% from 2015 to 2023. As we look to the future, the absence of data for 2024 leaves us anticipating whether Xylem can continue its upward trajectory or if Jacobs will maintain its lead.
Who Generates More Revenue? Xylem Inc. or Jacobs Engineering Group Inc.
Cost Insights: Breaking Down Xylem Inc. and Jacobs Engineering Group Inc.'s Expenses
Gross Profit Trends Compared: Xylem Inc. vs Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation
Gross Profit Comparison: Xylem Inc. and RB Global, Inc. Trends
Gross Profit Analysis: Comparing Xylem Inc. and Expeditors International of Washington, Inc.
SG&A Efficiency Analysis: Comparing Xylem Inc. and Jacobs Engineering Group Inc.
Comparative EBITDA Analysis: Xylem Inc. vs Jacobs Engineering Group Inc.