Texas Instruments Incorporated or Seagate Technology Holdings plc: Who Manages SG&A Costs Better?

SG&A Cost Management: Texas Instruments vs. Seagate

__timestampSeagate Technology Holdings plcTexas Instruments Incorporated
Wednesday, January 1, 20147220000001843000000
Thursday, January 1, 20158570000001748000000
Friday, January 1, 20166350000001767000000
Sunday, January 1, 20176060000001694000000
Monday, January 1, 20185620000001684000000
Tuesday, January 1, 20194530000001645000000
Wednesday, January 1, 20204730000001623000000
Friday, January 1, 20215020000001666000000
Saturday, January 1, 20225590000001704000000
Sunday, January 1, 20234910000001825000000
Monday, January 1, 20244600000001794000000
Loading chart...

Unlocking the unknown

Managing SG&A Costs: A Tale of Two Giants

In the competitive landscape of technology, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for profitability. Texas Instruments Incorporated (TI) and Seagate Technology Holdings plc, two industry titans, have shown distinct approaches over the past decade. From 2014 to 2024, TI consistently maintained higher SG&A expenses, averaging around $1.73 billion annually, compared to Seagate's $575 million. However, the trend reveals a 3% reduction in TI's SG&A costs, while Seagate achieved a more significant 36% decrease. This suggests Seagate's strategic focus on cost efficiency, despite its smaller scale. As the tech industry evolves, these financial strategies highlight the importance of balancing operational costs with growth ambitions. Investors and analysts should consider these trends when evaluating the financial health and strategic direction of these companies.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025