__timestamp | C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc. | Snap-on Incorporated |
---|---|---|
Wednesday, January 1, 2014 | 320213000 | 1047900000 |
Thursday, January 1, 2015 | 358760000 | 1009100000 |
Friday, January 1, 2016 | 375061000 | 1001400000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2017 | 413404000 | 1101300000 |
Monday, January 1, 2018 | 449610000 | 1080700000 |
Tuesday, January 1, 2019 | 497806000 | 1071500000 |
Wednesday, January 1, 2020 | 496122000 | 1054800000 |
Friday, January 1, 2021 | 526371000 | 1202300000 |
Saturday, January 1, 2022 | 603415000 | 1181200000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2023 | 624266000 | 1249000000 |
Monday, January 1, 2024 | 639624000 | 0 |
Igniting the spark of knowledge
In the ever-evolving landscape of corporate finance, understanding the spending patterns of industry giants can offer valuable insights. Snap-on Incorporated and C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc. present a fascinating case study in Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses from 2014 to 2023.
Over the past decade, Snap-on Incorporated has consistently outpaced C.H. Robinson in SG&A spending, with an average expenditure nearly 130% higher. This trend highlights Snap-on's aggressive investment in administrative and sales functions, peaking in 2023 with a 19% increase from 2014. In contrast, C.H. Robinson's SG&A expenses grew by approximately 100% over the same period, reflecting a more conservative approach.
While 2024 data for Snap-on is unavailable, C.H. Robinson's continued growth suggests a potential shift in strategy. As these companies navigate the complexities of their respective industries, their SG&A spending patterns will remain a key indicator of their financial health and strategic priorities.
Snap-on Incorporated vs C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc.: Annual Revenue Growth Compared
Cost of Revenue Comparison: Snap-on Incorporated vs C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc.
Snap-on Incorporated vs C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc.: A Gross Profit Performance Breakdown
Comparing SG&A Expenses: Snap-on Incorporated vs AECOM Trends and Insights
Selling, General, and Administrative Costs: Snap-on Incorporated vs Saia, Inc.
Selling, General, and Administrative Costs: Snap-on Incorporated vs Pool Corporation
Comparing SG&A Expenses: Snap-on Incorporated vs Clean Harbors, Inc. Trends and Insights
Breaking Down SG&A Expenses: Snap-on Incorporated vs Nordson Corporation
Breaking Down SG&A Expenses: Snap-on Incorporated vs Curtiss-Wright Corporation
Snap-on Incorporated vs C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc.: In-Depth EBITDA Performance Comparison