Snap-on Incorporated and C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc.: SG&A Spending Patterns Compared

SG&A Spending: Snap-on vs. C.H. Robinson

__timestampC.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc.Snap-on Incorporated
Wednesday, January 1, 20143202130001047900000
Thursday, January 1, 20153587600001009100000
Friday, January 1, 20163750610001001400000
Sunday, January 1, 20174134040001101300000
Monday, January 1, 20184496100001080700000
Tuesday, January 1, 20194978060001071500000
Wednesday, January 1, 20204961220001054800000
Friday, January 1, 20215263710001202300000
Saturday, January 1, 20226034150001181200000
Sunday, January 1, 20236242660001249000000
Monday, January 1, 20246396240000
Loading chart...

Igniting the spark of knowledge

SG&A Spending Patterns: A Tale of Two Companies

In the ever-evolving landscape of corporate finance, understanding the spending patterns of industry giants can offer valuable insights. Snap-on Incorporated and C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc. present a fascinating case study in Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses from 2014 to 2023.

A Decade of Financial Strategy

Over the past decade, Snap-on Incorporated has consistently outpaced C.H. Robinson in SG&A spending, with an average expenditure nearly 130% higher. This trend highlights Snap-on's aggressive investment in administrative and sales functions, peaking in 2023 with a 19% increase from 2014. In contrast, C.H. Robinson's SG&A expenses grew by approximately 100% over the same period, reflecting a more conservative approach.

Missing Data and Future Trends

While 2024 data for Snap-on is unavailable, C.H. Robinson's continued growth suggests a potential shift in strategy. As these companies navigate the complexities of their respective industries, their SG&A spending patterns will remain a key indicator of their financial health and strategic priorities.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025