SG&A Efficiency Analysis: Comparing Lam Research Corporation and NetEase, Inc.

SG&A Efficiency: Lam Research vs. NetEase

__timestampLam Research CorporationNetEase, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 20146133410002362667000
Thursday, January 1, 20155916110003972624000
Friday, January 1, 20166309540005987969000
Sunday, January 1, 20176674850009387454000
Monday, January 1, 201876221900012718007000
Tuesday, January 1, 20197024070009351425000
Wednesday, January 1, 202068247900014075615000
Friday, January 1, 202182987500016477740000
Saturday, January 1, 202288573700018098519000
Sunday, January 1, 202383275300018869340000
Monday, January 1, 2024868247000
Loading chart...

Data in motion

SG&A Efficiency: A Tale of Two Giants

In the ever-evolving landscape of global technology, understanding the efficiency of Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial. Lam Research Corporation and NetEase, Inc., two titans in their respective fields, offer a fascinating study in contrasts. From 2014 to 2023, Lam Research's SG&A expenses grew modestly, peaking at approximately $886 million in 2022, reflecting a steady increase of around 45% over the decade. In contrast, NetEase, Inc. saw a dramatic rise, with expenses surging by over 700%, reaching nearly $18.9 billion in 2023. This stark difference highlights NetEase's aggressive expansion strategy compared to Lam Research's more conservative approach. Notably, data for 2024 is incomplete, leaving room for speculation on future trends. As these companies navigate the complexities of the global market, their SG&A strategies will undoubtedly play a pivotal role in shaping their competitive edge.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025