__timestamp | Howmet Aerospace Inc. | Old Dominion Freight Line, Inc. |
---|---|---|
Wednesday, January 1, 2014 | 770000000 | 144817000 |
Thursday, January 1, 2015 | 765000000 | 153589000 |
Friday, January 1, 2016 | 947000000 | 152391000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2017 | 731000000 | 177205000 |
Monday, January 1, 2018 | 604000000 | 194368000 |
Tuesday, January 1, 2019 | 704000000 | 206125000 |
Wednesday, January 1, 2020 | 277000000 | 184185000 |
Friday, January 1, 2021 | 251000000 | 223757000 |
Saturday, January 1, 2022 | 288000000 | 258883000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2023 | 343000000 | 281053000 |
Monday, January 1, 2024 | 362000000 |
Igniting the spark of knowledge
In the competitive landscape of aerospace and logistics, Howmet Aerospace Inc. and Old Dominion Freight Line, Inc. present a fascinating study in SG&A efficiency. Over the past decade, Howmet Aerospace has seen a significant reduction in its Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses, dropping from 77% of its 2014 levels to just 34% in 2023. This reflects a strategic shift towards leaner operations. In contrast, Old Dominion Freight Line has steadily increased its SG&A expenses, growing by 94% over the same period, indicating a robust expansion strategy.
Howmet Aerospace Inc. vs Old Dominion Freight Line, Inc.: Examining Key Revenue Metrics
Cost of Revenue Trends: Howmet Aerospace Inc. vs Old Dominion Freight Line, Inc.
Key Insights on Gross Profit: Howmet Aerospace Inc. vs Old Dominion Freight Line, Inc.
Howmet Aerospace Inc. and United Airlines Holdings, Inc.: SG&A Spending Patterns Compared
Operational Costs Compared: SG&A Analysis of Howmet Aerospace Inc. and Cummins Inc.
Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better? Howmet Aerospace Inc. or Axon Enterprise, Inc.
SG&A Efficiency Analysis: Comparing Howmet Aerospace Inc. and Quanta Services, Inc.
SG&A Efficiency Analysis: Comparing Howmet Aerospace Inc. and Waste Connections, Inc.
EBITDA Analysis: Evaluating Howmet Aerospace Inc. Against Old Dominion Freight Line, Inc.
SG&A Efficiency Analysis: Comparing Howmet Aerospace Inc. and AMETEK, Inc.