Selling, General, and Administrative Costs: Workday, Inc. vs Trimble Inc.

SG&A Expenses: Workday's Growth vs Trimble's Stability

__timestampTrimble Inc.Workday, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 2014634689000263294000
Thursday, January 1, 2015629900000421891000
Friday, January 1, 2016633600000582634000
Sunday, January 1, 2017706500000781996000
Monday, January 1, 2018829600000906276000
Tuesday, January 1, 20198348000001238682000
Wednesday, January 1, 20207679000001514272000
Friday, January 1, 20218759000001647241000
Saturday, January 1, 20229758000001947933000
Sunday, January 1, 202310705000002452180000
Monday, January 1, 20242841000000
Loading chart...

Unlocking the unknown

A Comparative Analysis of SG&A Expenses: Workday, Inc. vs Trimble Inc.

In the ever-evolving landscape of corporate finance, understanding the nuances of Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial. Over the past decade, Workday, Inc. and Trimble Inc. have showcased distinct trajectories in their SG&A expenditures. From 2014 to 2023, Workday's SG&A costs surged by over 830%, reflecting its aggressive growth strategy and expansion efforts. In contrast, Trimble's expenses grew by approximately 69%, indicating a more measured approach.

By 2023, Workday's SG&A expenses reached nearly $2.45 billion, dwarfing Trimble's $1.07 billion. This disparity highlights Workday's commitment to scaling its operations and investing in its workforce and infrastructure. However, the data for 2024 shows a gap for Trimble, suggesting a potential shift or strategic realignment. As these companies continue to navigate the competitive tech landscape, their SG&A strategies will undoubtedly play a pivotal role in shaping their financial futures.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025