Selling, General, and Administrative Costs: SAP SE vs Pure Storage, Inc.

SG&A Expenses: SAP SE vs Pure Storage, Inc. (2014-2024)

__timestampPure Storage, Inc.SAP SE
Wednesday, January 1, 2014606520005195000000
Thursday, January 1, 20151846740006449000000
Friday, January 1, 20163159760007299000000
Sunday, January 1, 20174446870007999000000
Monday, January 1, 20185752000007879000000
Tuesday, January 1, 20197216170009318000000
Wednesday, January 1, 20208911750008461000000
Friday, January 1, 20218984910009936000000
Saturday, January 1, 202298898200011015000000
Sunday, January 1, 2023112160500010192000000
Monday, January 1, 2024119726400010254000000
Loading chart...

In pursuit of knowledge

A Comparative Analysis of SG&A Expenses: SAP SE vs Pure Storage, Inc.

In the ever-evolving landscape of global business, understanding the financial strategies of industry leaders is crucial. Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses are a key indicator of a company's operational efficiency. From 2014 to 2023, SAP SE, a titan in enterprise software, consistently outpaced Pure Storage, Inc., a rising star in data storage solutions, in SG&A spending. SAP SE's expenses peaked in 2022, reaching approximately $11 billion, reflecting its expansive global operations. In contrast, Pure Storage, Inc. demonstrated a steady growth trajectory, with SG&A expenses increasing nearly 20-fold over the same period, from $60 million in 2014 to $1.2 billion in 2024. This growth underscores Pure Storage's aggressive market expansion and investment in sales and marketing. Notably, data for SAP SE in 2024 is unavailable, highlighting potential shifts in financial strategies or reporting. This analysis offers a window into the strategic priorities of these two industry players.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025