__timestamp | Amphenol Corporation | Microsoft Corporation |
---|---|---|
Wednesday, January 1, 2014 | 645100000 | 20488000000 |
Thursday, January 1, 2015 | 669100000 | 20324000000 |
Friday, January 1, 2016 | 798200000 | 19198000000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2017 | 878300000 | 19942000000 |
Monday, January 1, 2018 | 959500000 | 22223000000 |
Tuesday, January 1, 2019 | 971400000 | 23098000000 |
Wednesday, January 1, 2020 | 1014200000 | 24709000000 |
Friday, January 1, 2021 | 1226300000 | 25224000000 |
Saturday, January 1, 2022 | 1420900000 | 27725000000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2023 | 1489900000 | 30334000000 |
Monday, January 1, 2024 | 1855400000 | 32065000000 |
Unlocking the unknown
In the ever-evolving landscape of corporate finance, Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses serve as a critical indicator of a company's operational efficiency. Over the past decade, Microsoft Corporation and Amphenol Corporation have showcased contrasting trajectories in their SG&A expenditures.
From 2014 to 2024, Microsoft's SG&A expenses have surged by approximately 56%, reflecting its expansive growth and strategic investments. Notably, the tech giant's expenses peaked in 2024, reaching a staggering 32 billion dollars, underscoring its commitment to innovation and market dominance.
Conversely, Amphenol's SG&A costs have increased by nearly 188% over the same period. This steady rise highlights the company's robust expansion in the electronics sector, with 2024 marking its highest expenditure at nearly 1.9 billion dollars.
These trends offer a fascinating glimpse into how two industry leaders manage their operational costs amidst growth and market challenges.
Annual Revenue Comparison: Microsoft Corporation vs Amphenol Corporation
Cost of Revenue: Key Insights for Microsoft Corporation and Amphenol Corporation
Breaking Down SG&A Expenses: Microsoft Corporation vs Lam Research Corporation
Key Insights on Gross Profit: Microsoft Corporation vs Amphenol Corporation
Microsoft Corporation or Infosys Limited: Who Manages SG&A Costs Better?
Breaking Down SG&A Expenses: Microsoft Corporation vs MicroStrategy Incorporated
Selling, General, and Administrative Costs: Microsoft Corporation vs Marvell Technology, Inc.
Breaking Down SG&A Expenses: Microsoft Corporation vs Cadence Design Systems, Inc.
Breaking Down SG&A Expenses: Microsoft Corporation vs Intel Corporation
Microsoft Corporation and Synopsys, Inc.: SG&A Spending Patterns Compared
EBITDA Performance Review: Microsoft Corporation vs Amphenol Corporation
Breaking Down SG&A Expenses: Microsoft Corporation vs Motorola Solutions, Inc.