Selling, General, and Administrative Costs: J.B. Hunt Transport Services, Inc. vs Jacobs Engineering Group Inc.

SG&A Expenses: J.B. Hunt vs. Jacobs Engineering

__timestampJ.B. Hunt Transport Services, Inc.Jacobs Engineering Group Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 20141524690001545716000
Thursday, January 1, 20151667990001522811000
Friday, January 1, 20161854360001429233000
Sunday, January 1, 20172734400001379983000
Monday, January 1, 20183235870002180399000
Tuesday, January 1, 20193839810002072177000
Wednesday, January 1, 20203480760002050695000
Friday, January 1, 20213955330002355683000
Saturday, January 1, 20225701910002409190000
Sunday, January 1, 20235902420002398078000
Monday, January 1, 20242140320000
Loading chart...

Cracking the code

A Comparative Analysis of SG&A Expenses: J.B. Hunt vs. Jacobs Engineering

In the ever-evolving landscape of corporate finance, understanding the nuances of Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial. Over the past decade, J.B. Hunt Transport Services, Inc. and Jacobs Engineering Group Inc. have showcased distinct financial trajectories in this domain. From 2014 to 2023, J.B. Hunt's SG&A expenses have surged by approximately 287%, reflecting a strategic expansion and increased operational costs. In contrast, Jacobs Engineering, with a more stable growth pattern, saw a 55% increase in the same period, peaking in 2022. Notably, Jacobs consistently outspent J.B. Hunt, with expenses often exceeding J.B. Hunt's by over 500%. This disparity highlights differing business models and market strategies. As we look to 2024, Jacobs' data remains robust, while J.B. Hunt's figures are yet to be revealed, leaving room for speculation on future financial maneuvers.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025