Operational Costs Compared: SG&A Analysis of Texas Instruments Incorporated and Pure Storage, Inc.

SG&A Expenses: Texas Instruments vs. Pure Storage

__timestampPure Storage, Inc.Texas Instruments Incorporated
Wednesday, January 1, 2014606520001843000000
Thursday, January 1, 20151846740001748000000
Friday, January 1, 20163159760001767000000
Sunday, January 1, 20174446870001694000000
Monday, January 1, 20185752000001684000000
Tuesday, January 1, 20197216170001645000000
Wednesday, January 1, 20208911750001623000000
Friday, January 1, 20218984910001666000000
Saturday, January 1, 20229889820001704000000
Sunday, January 1, 202311216050001825000000
Monday, January 1, 202411972640001794000000
Loading chart...

In pursuit of knowledge

SG&A Expenses: A Comparative Analysis

Texas Instruments vs. Pure Storage

In the ever-evolving landscape of technology, operational efficiency is paramount. This analysis delves into the Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses of two industry giants: Texas Instruments Incorporated and Pure Storage, Inc., from 2014 to 2024.

Texas Instruments, a stalwart in the semiconductor industry, consistently maintained higher SG&A expenses, peaking at approximately $1.84 billion in 2014. Despite a slight dip, their expenses remained robust, reflecting their expansive operational scale. In contrast, Pure Storage, a relatively newer player, exhibited a dynamic growth trajectory. Starting with $60 million in 2014, their SG&A expenses surged by nearly 1,900% to $1.2 billion by 2024.

This stark contrast underscores the differing growth strategies: Texas Instruments' steady approach versus Pure Storage's aggressive expansion. As the tech industry continues to innovate, understanding these financial strategies offers invaluable insights into corporate growth and sustainability.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025