Operational Costs Compared: SG&A Analysis of Intel Corporation and Cadence Design Systems, Inc.

Intel vs. Cadence: A Decade of SG&A Trends

__timestampCadence Design Systems, Inc.Intel Corporation
Wednesday, January 1, 20145133070008136000000
Thursday, January 1, 20155124140007930000000
Friday, January 1, 20165203000008397000000
Sunday, January 1, 20175533420007474000000
Monday, January 1, 20185730750006750000000
Tuesday, January 1, 20196214790006150000000
Wednesday, January 1, 20206708850006180000000
Friday, January 1, 20217492800006543000000
Saturday, January 1, 20228463400007002000000
Sunday, January 1, 20239206490005634000000
Monday, January 1, 202410397660005507000000
Loading chart...

Unleashing insights

A Decade of SG&A: Intel vs. Cadence Design Systems

In the ever-evolving tech industry, operational efficiency is key. Over the past decade, Intel Corporation and Cadence Design Systems, Inc. have showcased contrasting trends in their Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses. From 2014 to 2023, Intel's SG&A expenses have seen a notable decline of approximately 31%, dropping from 8.1 billion to 5.6 billion. This reduction reflects Intel's strategic cost-cutting measures amidst a competitive landscape. In contrast, Cadence Design Systems has experienced a remarkable 79% increase in SG&A expenses, rising from 513 million to 921 million. This surge underscores Cadence's aggressive expansion and investment in growth opportunities. As the tech giants navigate the complexities of the market, their financial strategies reveal much about their priorities and future directions. Explore the data to understand how these industry leaders are shaping their operational landscapes.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025