Operational Costs Compared: SG&A Analysis of Fiserv, Inc. and II-VI Incorporated

Discover how Fiserv and II-VI manage their operational costs.

__timestampFiserv, Inc.II-VI Incorporated
Wednesday, January 1, 2014975000000137707000
Thursday, January 1, 20151034000000143539000
Friday, January 1, 20161101000000160646000
Sunday, January 1, 20171150000000176002000
Monday, January 1, 20181228000000208565000
Tuesday, January 1, 20193284000000233518000
Wednesday, January 1, 20205652000000440998000
Friday, January 1, 20215810000000483989000
Saturday, January 1, 20226059000000474096000
Sunday, January 1, 202365760000001036699000
Monday, January 1, 20246564000000854001000
Loading chart...

Data in motion

Analyzing SG&A Expenses: A Tale of Two Companies

In the dynamic landscape of corporate finance, understanding operational costs is crucial for stakeholders. One of the most significant components of these costs is Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses. These expenses encompass a wide range of costs that are not directly tied to production but are essential for running a business. Companies like Fiserv, Inc. and II-VI Incorporated provide a compelling case study in SG&A management, especially in the years following 2014.

A Decade of Change: 2014 to 2023

Between 2014 and 2023, Fiserv, Inc. and II-VI Incorporated navigated a rapidly evolving market. Fiserv, a leader in financial technology solutions, saw its SG&A expenses grow significantly. In 2014, the company reported approximately $975 million in SG&A expenses, which represented a mere 12% of its total operational costs at that time. Fast forward to 2023, and those expenses skyrocketed to nearly $6.58 billion, accounting for about 40% of its operational budget. This dramatic increase reflects Fiserv's aggressive expansion strategy and investment in technology to enhance customer service and operational efficiency.

In contrast, II-VI Incorporated, a global leader in engineered materials and optoelectronic components, displayed a different trajectory. Starting with around $137 million in SG&A expenses in 2014, the company experienced a steadier growth rate, culminating in approximately $1.04 billion by 2023. This increase illustrates a growth rate of about 660% over the decade, highlighting II-VI's strategic investments in innovation and market penetration.

Comparative Analysis: Trends and Insights

The stark contrast in SG&A expenses between these two companies raises intriguing questions about their operational strategies. Fiserv's aggressive spending on SG&A, which increased by over 570% from 2014 to 2023, suggests a focus on scaling operations and enhancing product offerings. This aligns with the broader trend in the fintech sector, where companies are investing heavily in technology and customer acquisition.

On the other hand, II-VI's more measured increase in SG&A expenses indicates a strategy focused on sustainable growth. The company’s SG&A expenses grew at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of about 24%, which, while significant, is markedly lower than Fiserv's rate. This approach may allow II-VI to maintain a healthier balance between growth and profitability, providing a buffer against market volatility.

Conclusion: The Future of SG&A Management

As we look to the future, the trends observed in SG&A expenses for both Fiserv and II-VI will be critical for investors and analysts alike. Understanding how these companies allocate their resources can provide valuable insights into their long-term viability and strategic direction. The ongoing evolution of the market will undoubtedly influence these expenses, making it essential for stakeholders to keep a close eye on these metrics.

In summary, the analysis of SG&A expenses for Fiserv, Inc. and II-VI Incorporated reveals not only their operational strategies but also the broader trends within their respective industries. As both companies continue to adapt to changing market conditions, their SG&A expenses will remain a vital indicator of their financial health and strategic priorities.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025