Operational Costs Compared: SG&A Analysis of Adobe Inc. and Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc.

Adobe vs. Broadridge: A Decade of SG&A Expense Trends

__timestampAdobe Inc.Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 20142215140000376000000
Thursday, January 1, 20152215161000396800000
Friday, January 1, 20162487907000420900000
Sunday, January 1, 20172822298000501400000
Monday, January 1, 20183365727000565400000
Tuesday, January 1, 20194124984000577500000
Wednesday, January 1, 20204559000000639000000
Friday, January 1, 20215406000000744300000
Saturday, January 1, 20226187000000832300000
Sunday, January 1, 20236764000000849000000
Monday, January 1, 20247293000000916800000
Loading chart...

Unleashing the power of data

A Decade of SG&A: Adobe vs. Broadridge

In the ever-evolving landscape of corporate finance, understanding operational costs is crucial. Over the past decade, Adobe Inc. and Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc. have showcased distinct trajectories in their Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses. Adobe's SG&A expenses have surged by approximately 230% from 2014 to 2024, reflecting its aggressive growth and expansion strategies. In contrast, Broadridge's expenses have increased by about 144% over the same period, indicating steady growth.

Key Insights

Adobe's SG&A expenses consistently outpace Broadridge's, highlighting its larger scale and broader market reach. By 2024, Adobe's expenses are projected to be nearly eight times those of Broadridge. This comparison underscores the differing operational strategies and market positions of these two industry giants. As businesses navigate the complexities of the modern economy, such insights into operational costs can provide valuable guidance for strategic planning.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025