Operational Costs Compared: SG&A Analysis of Accenture plc and Marvell Technology, Inc.

Accenture vs. Marvell: A Decade of SG&A Trends

__timestampAccenture plcMarvell Technology, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 20145401969000259169000
Thursday, January 1, 20155373370000273982000
Friday, January 1, 20165466982000280970000
Sunday, January 1, 20176397883000299727000
Monday, January 1, 20186601872000238166000
Tuesday, January 1, 20197009614000424360000
Wednesday, January 1, 20207462514000464580000
Friday, January 1, 20218742599000467240000
Saturday, January 1, 202210334358000955245000
Sunday, January 1, 202310858572000843600000
Monday, January 1, 202411128030000834000000
Loading chart...

Infusing magic into the data realm

A Decade of Operational Cost Trends: Accenture vs. Marvell

In the ever-evolving landscape of technology and consulting, operational efficiency is paramount. Over the past decade, Accenture plc and Marvell Technology, Inc. have showcased contrasting trajectories in their Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses. Accenture, a global consulting giant, has seen its SG&A expenses grow by approximately 106% from 2014 to 2024, reflecting its expansive global operations and strategic investments. In contrast, Marvell Technology, a leader in semiconductor solutions, has maintained a more modest increase of around 222% in the same period, highlighting its focus on streamlined operations and innovation.

Key Insights

  • Accenture's Growth: By 2024, Accenture's SG&A expenses are projected to be nearly 13 times higher than Marvell's, underscoring its vast operational scale.
  • Marvell's Efficiency: Despite a smaller scale, Marvell's strategic cost management has allowed it to remain competitive in a challenging market.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025