Microsoft Corporation or NetApp, Inc.: Who Manages SG&A Costs Better?

Microsoft vs. NetApp: SG&A Cost Management Showdown

__timestampMicrosoft CorporationNetApp, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 2014204880000002179200000
Thursday, January 1, 2015203240000002197400000
Friday, January 1, 2016191980000002099000000
Sunday, January 1, 2017199420000001904000000
Monday, January 1, 2018222230000002009000000
Tuesday, January 1, 2019230980000001935000000
Wednesday, January 1, 2020247090000001848000000
Friday, January 1, 2021252240000002001000000
Saturday, January 1, 2022277250000002136000000
Sunday, January 1, 2023303340000002094000000
Monday, January 1, 2024320650000002136000000
Loading chart...

Igniting the spark of knowledge

Microsoft vs. NetApp: A Decade of SG&A Management

In the ever-evolving tech industry, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for maintaining profitability. Over the past decade, Microsoft Corporation and NetApp, Inc. have demonstrated contrasting approaches to SG&A cost management. From 2014 to 2024, Microsoft's SG&A expenses have surged by approximately 56%, reflecting its aggressive expansion and investment strategies. In contrast, NetApp has maintained a more stable SG&A expenditure, with only a 2% increase over the same period, showcasing its disciplined cost management.

Microsoft's significant rise in SG&A expenses, peaking at over $32 billion in 2024, underscores its commitment to growth and innovation. Meanwhile, NetApp's consistent expenses, hovering around $2 billion annually, highlight its focus on operational efficiency. This comparison offers valuable insights into how these tech giants balance growth ambitions with cost control, providing a fascinating study for investors and industry analysts alike.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025