__timestamp | Microsoft Corporation | NetApp, Inc. |
---|---|---|
Wednesday, January 1, 2014 | 20488000000 | 2179200000 |
Thursday, January 1, 2015 | 20324000000 | 2197400000 |
Friday, January 1, 2016 | 19198000000 | 2099000000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2017 | 19942000000 | 1904000000 |
Monday, January 1, 2018 | 22223000000 | 2009000000 |
Tuesday, January 1, 2019 | 23098000000 | 1935000000 |
Wednesday, January 1, 2020 | 24709000000 | 1848000000 |
Friday, January 1, 2021 | 25224000000 | 2001000000 |
Saturday, January 1, 2022 | 27725000000 | 2136000000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2023 | 30334000000 | 2094000000 |
Monday, January 1, 2024 | 32065000000 | 2136000000 |
Igniting the spark of knowledge
In the ever-evolving tech industry, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for maintaining profitability. Over the past decade, Microsoft Corporation and NetApp, Inc. have demonstrated contrasting approaches to SG&A cost management. From 2014 to 2024, Microsoft's SG&A expenses have surged by approximately 56%, reflecting its aggressive expansion and investment strategies. In contrast, NetApp has maintained a more stable SG&A expenditure, with only a 2% increase over the same period, showcasing its disciplined cost management.
Microsoft's significant rise in SG&A expenses, peaking at over $32 billion in 2024, underscores its commitment to growth and innovation. Meanwhile, NetApp's consistent expenses, hovering around $2 billion annually, highlight its focus on operational efficiency. This comparison offers valuable insights into how these tech giants balance growth ambitions with cost control, providing a fascinating study for investors and industry analysts alike.
Who Generates More Revenue? Microsoft Corporation or NetApp, Inc.
Cost Insights: Breaking Down Microsoft Corporation and NetApp, Inc.'s Expenses
Microsoft Corporation or Tyler Technologies, Inc.: Who Manages SG&A Costs Better?
Key Insights on Gross Profit: Microsoft Corporation vs NetApp, Inc.
Cost Management Insights: SG&A Expenses for Microsoft Corporation and Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (publ)
Selling, General, and Administrative Costs: Microsoft Corporation vs Nokia Oyj
Research and Development Investment: Microsoft Corporation vs NetApp, Inc.
A Professional Review of EBITDA: Microsoft Corporation Compared to NetApp, Inc.
Microsoft Corporation vs FLEETCOR Technologies, Inc.: SG&A Expense Trends
Breaking Down SG&A Expenses: Microsoft Corporation vs ON Semiconductor Corporation
Microsoft Corporation and Western Digital Corporation: SG&A Spending Patterns Compared
Comparing SG&A Expenses: Microsoft Corporation vs Ubiquiti Inc. Trends and Insights