__timestamp | KLA Corporation | Microsoft Corporation |
---|---|---|
Wednesday, January 1, 2014 | 384907000 | 20488000000 |
Thursday, January 1, 2015 | 406864000 | 20324000000 |
Friday, January 1, 2016 | 379399000 | 19198000000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2017 | 389336000 | 19942000000 |
Monday, January 1, 2018 | 443426000 | 22223000000 |
Tuesday, January 1, 2019 | 599124000 | 23098000000 |
Wednesday, January 1, 2020 | 734149000 | 24709000000 |
Friday, January 1, 2021 | 729602000 | 25224000000 |
Saturday, January 1, 2022 | 860007000 | 27725000000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2023 | 986326000 | 30334000000 |
Monday, January 1, 2024 | 969509000 | 32065000000 |
Unlocking the unknown
In the competitive landscape of technology giants, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for maintaining profitability. Over the past decade, Microsoft Corporation and KLA Corporation have demonstrated contrasting approaches to handling these costs.
From 2014 to 2024, Microsoft's SG&A expenses have consistently been higher, peaking at approximately $32 billion in 2024. This represents a 56% increase from 2014. In contrast, KLA Corporation's expenses grew from around $385 million in 2014 to nearly $970 million in 2024, marking a 152% increase.
While Microsoft's larger scale justifies its higher absolute expenses, KLA's rapid growth in SG&A costs suggests a strategic expansion. The data highlights the importance of balancing cost management with growth strategies, a lesson for businesses aiming to thrive in the tech industry.
Microsoft Corporation vs KLA Corporation: Examining Key Revenue Metrics
Cost of Revenue: Key Insights for Microsoft Corporation and KLA Corporation
Selling, General, and Administrative Costs: Microsoft Corporation vs Sony Group Corporation
Gross Profit Trends Compared: Microsoft Corporation vs KLA Corporation
Selling, General, and Administrative Costs: Microsoft Corporation vs Fiserv, Inc.
Selling, General, and Administrative Costs: Microsoft Corporation vs Fiserv, Inc.
Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better? Microsoft Corporation or Analog Devices, Inc.
Microsoft Corporation and Palo Alto Networks, Inc.: SG&A Spending Patterns Compared
R&D Spending Showdown: Microsoft Corporation vs KLA Corporation
Microsoft Corporation and Micron Technology, Inc.: SG&A Spending Patterns Compared
Professional EBITDA Benchmarking: Microsoft Corporation vs KLA Corporation
Breaking Down SG&A Expenses: Microsoft Corporation vs Lam Research Corporation