__timestamp | Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc. | Microsoft Corporation |
---|---|---|
Wednesday, January 1, 2014 | 376000000 | 20488000000 |
Thursday, January 1, 2015 | 396800000 | 20324000000 |
Friday, January 1, 2016 | 420900000 | 19198000000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2017 | 501400000 | 19942000000 |
Monday, January 1, 2018 | 565400000 | 22223000000 |
Tuesday, January 1, 2019 | 577500000 | 23098000000 |
Wednesday, January 1, 2020 | 639000000 | 24709000000 |
Friday, January 1, 2021 | 744300000 | 25224000000 |
Saturday, January 1, 2022 | 832300000 | 27725000000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2023 | 849000000 | 30334000000 |
Monday, January 1, 2024 | 916800000 | 32065000000 |
Infusing magic into the data realm
In the ever-evolving landscape of corporate finance, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for maintaining profitability. Over the past decade, Microsoft Corporation and Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc. have showcased contrasting approaches to SG&A management. From 2014 to 2024, Microsoft's SG&A expenses have surged by approximately 56%, reflecting its expansive growth strategy. In contrast, Broadridge's SG&A costs have increased by about 144%, indicating a more aggressive scaling approach.
While Microsoft's SG&A expenses are significantly higher, representing its vast operational scale, Broadridge's rapid increase suggests a focus on expansion and market penetration. This comparison highlights the strategic choices companies make in balancing cost management with growth ambitions. As investors and analysts evaluate these trends, understanding the nuances of SG&A management becomes essential in assessing a company's financial health and strategic direction.
Microsoft Corporation and Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc.: A Comprehensive Revenue Analysis
Cost Insights: Breaking Down Microsoft Corporation and Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc.'s Expenses
Gross Profit Trends Compared: Microsoft Corporation vs Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc.
Microsoft Corporation or Microchip Technology Incorporated: Who Manages SG&A Costs Better?
Microsoft Corporation and II-VI Incorporated: SG&A Spending Patterns Compared
Microsoft Corporation vs ANSYS, Inc.: SG&A Expense Trends
Breaking Down SG&A Expenses: Microsoft Corporation vs Monolithic Power Systems, Inc.
Microsoft Corporation or Corpay, Inc.: Who Manages SG&A Costs Better?
Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better? Microsoft Corporation or CDW Corporation
Microsoft Corporation vs GoDaddy Inc.: SG&A Expense Trends
Operational Costs Compared: SG&A Analysis of Microsoft Corporation and Keysight Technologies, Inc.
EBITDA Metrics Evaluated: Microsoft Corporation vs Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc.