Lam Research Corporation or MicroStrategy Incorporated: Who Manages SG&A Costs Better?

SG&A Cost Management: Lam Research vs. MicroStrategy

__timestampLam Research CorporationMicroStrategy Incorporated
Wednesday, January 1, 2014613341000321429000
Thursday, January 1, 2015591611000229254000
Friday, January 1, 2016630954000238202000
Sunday, January 1, 2017667485000254773000
Monday, January 1, 2018762219000291659000
Tuesday, January 1, 2019702407000277932000
Wednesday, January 1, 2020682479000229046000
Friday, January 1, 2021829875000255642000
Saturday, January 1, 2022885737000258303000
Sunday, January 1, 2023832753000264983000
Monday, January 1, 2024868247000278618000
Loading chart...

Unveiling the hidden dimensions of data

Who Manages SG&A Costs Better: Lam Research or MicroStrategy?

In the competitive landscape of technology companies, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for maintaining profitability. Over the past decade, Lam Research Corporation and MicroStrategy Incorporated have demonstrated contrasting approaches to handling these costs. From 2014 to 2023, Lam Research's SG&A expenses have shown a steady increase, peaking at approximately 885 million in 2022, reflecting a growth of about 44% from 2014. In contrast, MicroStrategy's SG&A expenses have remained relatively stable, with a slight decrease of around 18% over the same period, ending at approximately 265 million in 2023. This suggests that while Lam Research is expanding its operations, MicroStrategy is focusing on cost efficiency. However, the data for 2024 is incomplete, leaving room for speculation on future trends. Understanding these dynamics can provide valuable insights for investors and stakeholders in the tech industry.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025