Key Insights on Gross Profit: Applied Materials, Inc. vs Pure Storage, Inc.

Comparing a decade of growth: Applied Materials vs Pure Storage

__timestampApplied Materials, Inc.Pure Storage, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 2014384300000018604000
Thursday, January 1, 2015395200000096899000
Friday, January 1, 20164511000000272440000
Sunday, January 1, 20176532000000475698000
Monday, January 1, 20187817000000669238000
Tuesday, January 1, 20196386000000902296000
Wednesday, January 1, 202076920000001133554000
Friday, January 1, 2021109140000001148924000
Saturday, January 1, 2022119930000001472519000
Sunday, January 1, 2023123840000001897646000
Monday, January 1, 2024128970000002021191000
Loading chart...

Data in motion

A Decade of Growth: Applied Materials, Inc. vs Pure Storage, Inc.

In the ever-evolving landscape of technology, the financial performance of companies like Applied Materials, Inc. and Pure Storage, Inc. offers a fascinating glimpse into industry dynamics. Over the past decade, Applied Materials has consistently demonstrated robust growth, with its gross profit surging by over 230% from 2014 to 2024. This impressive trajectory underscores its dominant position in the semiconductor equipment sector.

Conversely, Pure Storage, Inc., a relative newcomer, has shown remarkable progress, with its gross profit increasing by a staggering 10,750% during the same period. This meteoric rise highlights its growing influence in the data storage industry. While Applied Materials' gross profit remains significantly higher, Pure Storage's rapid growth trajectory suggests a promising future.

These insights not only reflect the companies' financial health but also their strategic positioning in a competitive market, making them key players to watch in the coming years.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025