Honeywell International Inc. or Axon Enterprise, Inc.: Who Manages SG&A Costs Better?

SG&A Cost Management: Honeywell vs. Axon

__timestampAxon Enterprise, Inc.Honeywell International Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 2014541580005518000000
Thursday, January 1, 2015696980005006000000
Friday, January 1, 20161080760005469000000
Sunday, January 1, 20171386920005808000000
Monday, January 1, 20181568860006051000000
Tuesday, January 1, 20192129590005519000000
Wednesday, January 1, 20203072860004772000000
Friday, January 1, 20215150070004798000000
Saturday, January 1, 20224015750005214000000
Sunday, January 1, 20234968740004657000000
Monday, January 1, 20245466000000
Loading chart...

In pursuit of knowledge

SG&A Cost Management: Honeywell vs. Axon

In the competitive landscape of corporate finance, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for profitability. Honeywell International Inc. and Axon Enterprise, Inc. offer a fascinating case study in this regard. Over the past decade, Honeywell's SG&A expenses have fluctuated between $4.7 billion and $6 billion, reflecting a stable yet substantial cost structure. In contrast, Axon has seen a dramatic rise, with expenses increasing nearly tenfold from $54 million in 2014 to $515 million in 2021.

A Decade of Financial Strategy

From 2014 to 2023, Honeywell's SG&A expenses have shown a slight downward trend, decreasing by approximately 16%. Meanwhile, Axon has experienced a staggering 850% increase, indicative of its aggressive growth strategy. This divergence highlights the different financial strategies employed by these companies: Honeywell's focus on efficiency versus Axon's investment in expansion.

Understanding these trends provides valuable insights into how these industry leaders manage their operational costs.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025