EBITDA Metrics Evaluated: Thomson Reuters Corporation vs Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation

Thomson Reuters vs. Westinghouse: A Decade of EBITDA Insights

__timestampThomson Reuters CorporationWestinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation
Wednesday, January 1, 20144289000000588370000
Thursday, January 1, 20153151000000672301000
Friday, January 1, 20162999000000535893000
Sunday, January 1, 20171495930891532795000
Monday, January 1, 20181345686008584199000
Tuesday, January 1, 201919134746751067300000
Wednesday, January 1, 202027570000001229400000
Friday, January 1, 202119942964411405000000
Saturday, January 1, 202230100000001519000000
Sunday, January 1, 202329500000001787000000
Monday, January 1, 20241609000000
Loading chart...

In pursuit of knowledge

A Decade of EBITDA: Thomson Reuters vs. Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies

In the ever-evolving landscape of corporate finance, EBITDA (Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation, and Amortization) serves as a crucial metric for evaluating a company's operational performance. Over the past decade, from 2014 to 2023, Thomson Reuters Corporation and Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation have showcased contrasting EBITDA trajectories.

Thomson Reuters began the period with a robust EBITDA, peaking in 2014, but experienced a significant decline of approximately 69% by 2018. However, a resurgence was evident by 2022, with a 123% increase from its lowest point in 2018. Meanwhile, Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies demonstrated a steady upward trend, with a notable 204% growth from 2014 to 2023.

This analysis highlights the dynamic nature of corporate performance, emphasizing the importance of strategic adaptability in maintaining financial health.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025