Cost of Revenue: Key Insights for ASML Holding N.V. and Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.

Cost of Revenue: ASML vs. Fidelity National - A Decade of Insights

__timestampASML Holding N.V.Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 201433589070004332700000
Thursday, January 1, 201533917000004393200000
Friday, January 1, 201637503000006233000000
Sunday, January 1, 201749761000005794000000
Monday, January 1, 201862257000005569000000
Tuesday, January 1, 201969199000006610000000
Wednesday, January 1, 202071813000008348000000
Friday, January 1, 202188020000008682000000
Saturday, January 1, 2022106607000008820000000
Sunday, January 1, 2023134224000006145000000
Monday, January 1, 2024137709000006323000000
Loading chart...

Unleashing insights

Analyzing Cost of Revenue Trends: ASML vs. Fidelity National

In the ever-evolving landscape of global business, understanding cost structures is crucial. ASML Holding N.V., a leader in semiconductor manufacturing, and Fidelity National Information Services, Inc., a giant in financial services, present intriguing contrasts in their cost of revenue trends from 2014 to 2023. Over this period, ASML's cost of revenue surged by approximately 300%, reflecting its aggressive expansion and innovation in the semiconductor sector. In contrast, Fidelity National's costs grew by about 42%, indicating a more stable yet consistent growth pattern in the financial services industry. Notably, ASML's costs peaked in 2023, reaching nearly double that of Fidelity National, highlighting the capital-intensive nature of the semiconductor industry. These insights underscore the diverse financial dynamics at play in different sectors, offering valuable lessons for investors and industry analysts alike.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025