__timestamp | CNH Industrial N.V. | Xylem Inc. |
---|---|---|
Wednesday, January 1, 2014 | 25534000000 | 2403000000 |
Thursday, January 1, 2015 | 20357000000 | 2249000000 |
Friday, January 1, 2016 | 19539000000 | 2310000000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2017 | 21621000000 | 2856000000 |
Monday, January 1, 2018 | 22958000000 | 3181000000 |
Tuesday, January 1, 2019 | 21832000000 | 3203000000 |
Wednesday, January 1, 2020 | 21327000000 | 3046000000 |
Friday, January 1, 2021 | 25951000000 | 3220000000 |
Saturday, January 1, 2022 | 16797000000 | 3438000000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2023 | 16805000000 | 4647000000 |
Cracking the code
In the ever-evolving landscape of industrial giants, Xylem Inc. and CNH Industrial N.V. have carved distinct paths over the past decade. From 2014 to 2023, CNH Industrial's cost of revenue has seen a notable decline of approximately 34%, dropping from its peak in 2014. This trend reflects strategic shifts and operational efficiencies in response to global market dynamics. In contrast, Xylem Inc. has experienced a robust growth trajectory, with its cost of revenue surging by nearly 93% over the same period. This increase underscores Xylem's expanding footprint and investment in innovative water solutions.
The data reveals a fascinating narrative of adaptation and growth. While CNH Industrial has streamlined its operations, Xylem's commitment to innovation has driven its cost structure upward, signaling a bold approach to market challenges.
Breaking Down Revenue Trends: Xylem Inc. vs CNH Industrial N.V.
Xylem Inc. vs Graco Inc.: Efficiency in Cost of Revenue Explored
Comparing Cost of Revenue Efficiency: Xylem Inc. vs Comfort Systems USA, Inc.
Cost Insights: Breaking Down Xylem Inc. and AECOM's Expenses
Comparing Cost of Revenue Efficiency: Xylem Inc. vs Pool Corporation
Analyzing Cost of Revenue: Xylem Inc. and Stanley Black & Decker, Inc.
Comparing Cost of Revenue Efficiency: Xylem Inc. vs Saia, Inc.
Selling, General, and Administrative Costs: Xylem Inc. vs CNH Industrial N.V.