Cost of Revenue Comparison: Honeywell International Inc. vs Rentokil Initial plc

Honeywell vs Rentokil: A Decade of Cost Dynamics

__timestampHoneywell International Inc.Rentokil Initial plc
Wednesday, January 1, 201428957000000297500000
Thursday, January 1, 201526747000000310200000
Friday, January 1, 201627150000000376100000
Sunday, January 1, 201727575000000474900000
Monday, January 1, 201829046000000514200000
Tuesday, January 1, 2019243390000002099000000
Wednesday, January 1, 2020221690000002136400000
Friday, January 1, 2021233940000002239100000
Saturday, January 1, 2022238250000002737000000
Sunday, January 1, 202322995000000927000000
Monday, January 1, 202423836000000
Loading chart...

Unveiling the hidden dimensions of data

Cost of Revenue: A Tale of Two Giants

In the world of industrial and commercial services, Honeywell International Inc. and Rentokil Initial plc stand as titans. Over the past decade, Honeywell's cost of revenue has shown a steady decline, dropping approximately 21% from 2014 to 2023. This trend reflects Honeywell's strategic focus on efficiency and cost management. In contrast, Rentokil Initial plc has experienced a remarkable growth in its cost of revenue, surging by over 200% during the same period. This increase highlights Rentokil's aggressive expansion and investment in its service capabilities.

The year 2018 marked a peak for Honeywell, with costs reaching their highest, while Rentokil saw its costs peak in 2022. These trends underscore the dynamic nature of the industry and the differing strategies employed by these two companies. As we look to the future, the cost management strategies of these industry leaders will continue to shape their competitive landscapes.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025