Cost of Revenue Comparison: Ferrovial SE vs Carlisle Companies Incorporated

Cost of Revenue: Carlisle vs Ferrovial - A Decade in Review

__timestampCarlisle Companies IncorporatedFerrovial SE
Wednesday, January 1, 201423845000001131000000
Thursday, January 1, 201525365000001143000000
Friday, January 1, 201625181000001267000000
Sunday, January 1, 201729419000001345000000
Monday, January 1, 20183304800000985000000
Tuesday, January 1, 20193439900000949000000
Wednesday, January 1, 202028325000001005000000
Friday, January 1, 202134956000001077000000
Saturday, January 1, 202244345000001197000000
Sunday, January 1, 202330429000001129000000
Monday, January 1, 20243115900000
Loading chart...

Igniting the spark of knowledge

A Tale of Two Giants: Ferrovial SE vs Carlisle Companies Incorporated

In the ever-evolving landscape of global business, the cost of revenue is a critical metric that reflects a company's efficiency and market strategy. Over the past decade, Carlisle Companies Incorporated and Ferrovial SE have showcased contrasting trajectories in their cost of revenue. From 2014 to 2023, Carlisle Companies consistently reported higher costs, peaking in 2022 with a 44% increase from 2014. In contrast, Ferrovial SE maintained a more stable cost structure, with fluctuations but no significant upward trend. This divergence highlights Carlisle's aggressive expansion and investment strategies, while Ferrovial's steady approach suggests a focus on operational efficiency. As we delve into these figures, it becomes evident that understanding cost dynamics is crucial for investors and stakeholders aiming to gauge a company's long-term sustainability and growth potential.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025