Cost of Revenue Comparison: ASML Holding N.V. vs International Business Machines Corporation

ASML vs. IBM: A Decade of Cost Evolution

__timestampASML Holding N.V.International Business Machines Corporation
Wednesday, January 1, 2014335890700046386000000
Thursday, January 1, 2015339170000041057000000
Friday, January 1, 2016375030000041403000000
Sunday, January 1, 2017497610000042196000000
Monday, January 1, 2018622570000042655000000
Tuesday, January 1, 2019691990000026181000000
Wednesday, January 1, 2020718130000024314000000
Friday, January 1, 2021880200000025865000000
Saturday, January 1, 20221066070000027842000000
Sunday, January 1, 20231342240000027560000000
Monday, January 1, 20241377090000027202000000
Loading chart...

Unleashing insights

Cost of Revenue: A Tale of Two Giants

In the ever-evolving landscape of technology, ASML Holding N.V. and International Business Machines Corporation (IBM) stand as titans, each with a unique trajectory in cost management. From 2014 to 2023, ASML's cost of revenue surged by approximately 300%, reflecting its aggressive expansion and innovation in semiconductor technology. In contrast, IBM's cost of revenue decreased by about 40% over the same period, highlighting its strategic shift towards software and services.

A Decade of Transformation

ASML's cost of revenue grew from $3.4 billion in 2014 to $13.4 billion in 2023, underscoring its pivotal role in the semiconductor supply chain. Meanwhile, IBM's cost of revenue fell from $46.4 billion to $27.6 billion, as it pivoted away from hardware. This divergence illustrates the dynamic nature of the tech industry, where adaptability and strategic foresight are key to sustaining growth.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025