Cost of Revenue Comparison: Analog Devices, Inc. vs Monolithic Power Systems, Inc.

Analog Devices vs. Monolithic Power: A Decade of Growth

__timestampAnalog Devices, Inc.Monolithic Power Systems, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 20141034585000129917000
Thursday, January 1, 20151175830000152898000
Friday, January 1, 20161194236000177792000
Sunday, January 1, 20172045907000212646000
Monday, January 1, 20181967640000259714000
Tuesday, January 1, 20191977315000281596000
Wednesday, January 1, 20201912578000378498000
Friday, January 1, 20212793274000522339000
Saturday, January 1, 20224481479000745596000
Sunday, January 1, 20234428321000799953000
Monday, January 1, 20244045814000
Loading chart...

In pursuit of knowledge

A Tale of Two Innovators: Analog Devices vs. Monolithic Power Systems

In the ever-evolving landscape of semiconductor technology, Analog Devices, Inc. and Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. have emerged as key players. Over the past decade, from 2014 to 2023, these companies have showcased distinct trajectories in their cost of revenue, a critical metric reflecting the direct costs attributable to the production of goods sold by a company.

Analog Devices has seen a remarkable growth, with its cost of revenue increasing by over 300% from 2014 to 2023. This surge underscores its expanding operations and market reach. In contrast, Monolithic Power Systems, while smaller in scale, has demonstrated a steady rise, with its cost of revenue growing by approximately 500% over the same period, highlighting its agile adaptation and niche market focus.

Interestingly, the data for 2024 is incomplete, leaving room for speculation on future trends. As these companies continue to innovate, their financial strategies will be pivotal in shaping the semiconductor industry's future.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025