| __timestamp | Marvell Technology, Inc. | Pure Storage, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Wednesday, January 1, 2014 | 1654230000 | 24129000 |
| Thursday, January 1, 2015 | 1843706000 | 77552000 |
| Friday, January 1, 2016 | 1494736000 | 167893000 |
| Sunday, January 1, 2017 | 1029527000 | 252279000 |
| Monday, January 1, 2018 | 947230000 | 353781000 |
| Tuesday, January 1, 2019 | 1407399000 | 457528000 |
| Wednesday, January 1, 2020 | 1342220000 | 509886000 |
| Friday, January 1, 2021 | 1480550000 | 535255000 |
| Saturday, January 1, 2022 | 2398158000 | 708329000 |
| Sunday, January 1, 2023 | 2932100000 | 855788000 |
| Monday, January 1, 2024 | 3214100000 | 809430000 |
Unleashing the power of data
In the ever-evolving tech industry, understanding cost structures is crucial for investors and analysts alike. This analysis delves into the cost of revenue trends for Marvell Technology, Inc. and Pure Storage, Inc. over the past decade. From 2014 to 2024, Marvell Technology's cost of revenue has surged by approximately 94%, peaking in 2024. In contrast, Pure Storage has seen a more dramatic increase of over 3,250% during the same period, reflecting its rapid growth trajectory. Notably, Marvell's costs remained relatively stable until 2021, after which they escalated significantly, indicating potential strategic shifts or market expansions. Meanwhile, Pure Storage's consistent upward trend highlights its aggressive market penetration. These insights provide a window into the financial strategies and market dynamics of these tech giants, offering valuable perspectives for stakeholders.
Marvell Technology, Inc. or Pure Storage, Inc.: Who Leads in Yearly Revenue?
Comparing Cost of Revenue Efficiency: Marvell Technology, Inc. vs ASE Technology Holding Co., Ltd.
Cost Insights: Breaking Down Marvell Technology, Inc. and Seagate Technology Holdings plc's Expenses
Cost of Revenue Comparison: Marvell Technology, Inc. vs Check Point Software Technologies Ltd.
Marvell Technology, Inc. vs Zebra Technologies Corporation: Efficiency in Cost of Revenue Explored
Comparing Cost of Revenue Efficiency: Marvell Technology, Inc. vs FLEETCOR Technologies, Inc.
Comparing Cost of Revenue Efficiency: Marvell Technology, Inc. vs VeriSign, Inc.
Key Insights on Gross Profit: Marvell Technology, Inc. vs Pure Storage, Inc.
Cost Insights: Breaking Down Marvell Technology, Inc. and SS&C Technologies Holdings, Inc.'s Expenses
Analyzing Cost of Revenue: Marvell Technology, Inc. and Leidos Holdings, Inc.
Research and Development Investment: Marvell Technology, Inc. vs Pure Storage, Inc.
Marvell Technology, Inc. and Pure Storage, Inc.: SG&A Spending Patterns Compared