Comparing Cost of Revenue Efficiency: Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited vs Pure Storage, Inc.

Cost Efficiency: TSMC vs. Pure Storage Over a Decade

__timestampPure Storage, Inc.Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited
Wednesday, January 1, 201424129000385113000000
Thursday, January 1, 201577552000433117600000
Friday, January 1, 2016167893000473077100000
Sunday, January 1, 2017252279000482616200000
Monday, January 1, 2018353781000533487500000
Tuesday, January 1, 2019457528000577283500000
Wednesday, January 1, 2020509886000628124700000
Friday, January 1, 2021535255000767877700000
Saturday, January 1, 2022708329000915536500000
Sunday, January 1, 2023855788000986625000000
Monday, January 1, 20248094300001269954000000
Loading chart...

Unlocking the unknown

A Tale of Two Giants: Cost Efficiency in the Semiconductor and Storage Industries

In the ever-evolving landscape of technology, cost efficiency remains a pivotal factor for industry leaders. Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited (TSMC) and Pure Storage, Inc. exemplify contrasting trajectories in cost management from 2014 to 2024. TSMC, a titan in semiconductor manufacturing, has seen its cost of revenue soar by approximately 230% over the decade, reflecting its expansive growth and increased production capabilities. In contrast, Pure Storage, a key player in data storage solutions, has experienced a staggering 3,250% increase in cost of revenue, indicative of its aggressive market penetration and scaling efforts.

While TSMC's cost efficiency is bolstered by its established market presence, Pure Storage's rapid growth underscores the dynamic nature of the tech industry. This comparison not only highlights the diverse strategies of these companies but also offers insights into the broader economic trends shaping the semiconductor and storage sectors.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025