Comparing Cost of Revenue Efficiency: Palo Alto Networks, Inc. vs Teradyne, Inc.

Cost Efficiency: Palo Alto Networks vs. Teradyne

__timestampPalo Alto Networks, Inc.Teradyne, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 2014159628000769016000
Thursday, January 1, 2015251499000723935000
Friday, January 1, 2016370000000793683000
Sunday, January 1, 2017476600000912734000
Monday, January 1, 2018645300000880408000
Tuesday, January 1, 2019808400000955136000
Wednesday, January 1, 20209995000001335728000
Friday, January 1, 202112749000001496225000
Saturday, January 1, 202217187000001287894000
Sunday, January 1, 202319097000001139550000
Monday, January 1, 202420591999991170953000
Loading chart...

Infusing magic into the data realm

A Tale of Two Companies: Cost of Revenue Efficiency

In the ever-evolving landscape of technology, understanding cost efficiency is crucial. Palo Alto Networks, Inc. and Teradyne, Inc. offer a fascinating study in contrasts. From 2014 to 2023, Palo Alto Networks saw its cost of revenue skyrocket by over 1,200%, reflecting its aggressive growth strategy. In contrast, Teradyne's cost of revenue increased by a more modest 48% over the same period, indicating a steadier approach.

Palo Alto Networks: A Rapid Climb

Palo Alto Networks' cost of revenue surged from approximately $160 million in 2014 to nearly $1.9 billion in 2023. This dramatic rise underscores the company's rapid expansion and investment in scaling its operations.

Teradyne: Steady and Stable

Teradyne, on the other hand, maintained a more consistent trajectory, peaking at around $1.5 billion in 2021 before a slight decline. This stability suggests a focus on maintaining efficiency while navigating market fluctuations.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025