Comparing Cost of Revenue Efficiency: Lam Research Corporation vs Motorola Solutions, Inc.

Lam vs. Motorola: A Decade of Cost Efficiency

__timestampLam Research CorporationMotorola Solutions, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 201425998280003050000000
Thursday, January 1, 201529749760002976000000
Friday, January 1, 201632669710003169000000
Sunday, January 1, 201744102610003356000000
Monday, January 1, 201859119660003863000000
Tuesday, January 1, 201952951000003956000000
Wednesday, January 1, 202054360430003806000000
Friday, January 1, 202178208440004131000000
Saturday, January 1, 202293552320004883000000
Sunday, January 1, 202396515910005008000000
Monday, January 1, 202478525950005305000000
Loading chart...

Unveiling the hidden dimensions of data

Cost of Revenue Efficiency: A Tale of Two Giants

In the ever-evolving landscape of technology, understanding cost efficiency is crucial. Lam Research Corporation and Motorola Solutions, Inc. have been pivotal players in their respective fields. From 2014 to 2023, Lam Research's cost of revenue surged by approximately 271%, peaking in 2023. In contrast, Motorola Solutions experienced a more modest increase of around 64% over the same period. This disparity highlights Lam Research's aggressive growth strategy, while Motorola Solutions maintains a steady, controlled expansion.

A Decade of Change

The data reveals a fascinating trend: Lam Research's cost of revenue consistently outpaced Motorola's, especially post-2017. By 2023, Lam's cost of revenue was nearly double that of Motorola's. However, the absence of data for 2024 for Motorola suggests a potential shift or strategic change. This comparison underscores the dynamic nature of the tech industry and the diverse strategies companies employ to navigate it.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025