Comparing Cost of Revenue Efficiency: Gilead Sciences, Inc. vs BioCryst Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

Biotech Giants: Cost Efficiency Showdown

__timestampBioCryst Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Gilead Sciences, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 20141220003788000000
Thursday, January 1, 201518960004006000000
Friday, January 1, 201626990004261000000
Sunday, January 1, 201717020004371000000
Monday, January 1, 20184710004853000000
Tuesday, January 1, 201941010004675000000
Wednesday, January 1, 202016760004572000000
Friday, January 1, 202172640006601000000
Saturday, January 1, 202265940005657000000
Sunday, January 1, 202346610006498000000
Monday, January 1, 202428675800000
Loading chart...

Igniting the spark of knowledge

Cost of Revenue Efficiency: A Tale of Two Biotech Giants

In the competitive world of biotechnology, cost efficiency is a critical factor for success. This analysis compares the cost of revenue efficiency between Gilead Sciences, Inc. and BioCryst Pharmaceuticals, Inc. over the past decade. Gilead Sciences, a leader in antiviral drugs, consistently demonstrates robust cost management, with an average cost of revenue around $4.9 billion annually. In contrast, BioCryst Pharmaceuticals, known for its innovative treatments for rare diseases, operates on a much smaller scale, with costs averaging just over $3 million per year.

From 2014 to 2023, Gilead's cost of revenue peaked in 2021, reaching approximately $6.6 billion, while BioCryst saw its highest cost in the same year at $7.3 million. Despite the vast difference in scale, both companies show a commitment to optimizing their cost structures, reflecting their strategic priorities in the biotech industry.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025