Comparing Cost of Revenue Efficiency: Eli Lilly and Company vs Johnson & Johnson

Eli Lilly vs. Johnson & Johnson: Cost Efficiency Battle

__timestampEli Lilly and CompanyJohnson & Johnson
Wednesday, January 1, 2014493250000022746000000
Thursday, January 1, 2015503720000021536000000
Friday, January 1, 2016565490000021685000000
Sunday, January 1, 2017607020000025354000000
Monday, January 1, 2018468170000027091000000
Tuesday, January 1, 2019472120000027556000000
Wednesday, January 1, 2020548330000028427000000
Friday, January 1, 2021731280000023402000000
Saturday, January 1, 2022662980000024596000000
Sunday, January 1, 2023708220000026553000000
Monday, January 1, 2024841829999927471000000
Loading chart...

Igniting the spark of knowledge

A Tale of Two Giants: Cost of Revenue Efficiency

In the competitive landscape of the pharmaceutical industry, cost efficiency is a critical metric. Over the past decade, Eli Lilly and Company and Johnson & Johnson have demonstrated contrasting trends in their cost of revenue. From 2014 to 2023, Eli Lilly's cost of revenue increased by approximately 44%, reflecting strategic investments and operational shifts. In contrast, Johnson & Johnson maintained a relatively stable cost structure, with only a 17% increase over the same period.

Key Insights

  • Eli Lilly: The company saw a significant rise in cost efficiency, peaking in 2021 with a 48% increase from 2014. This suggests a focus on scaling operations and expanding market reach.
  • Johnson & Johnson: Despite fluctuations, the company managed to keep its cost of revenue growth modest, indicating robust cost management practices.

These insights highlight the diverse strategies employed by these industry leaders in navigating financial efficiency.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025