Comparing Cost of Revenue Efficiency: ASML Holding N.V. vs Palo Alto Networks, Inc.

ASML vs. Palo Alto: A Decade of Revenue Efficiency

__timestampASML Holding N.V.Palo Alto Networks, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 20143358907000159628000
Thursday, January 1, 20153391700000251499000
Friday, January 1, 20163750300000370000000
Sunday, January 1, 20174976100000476600000
Monday, January 1, 20186225700000645300000
Tuesday, January 1, 20196919900000808400000
Wednesday, January 1, 20207181300000999500000
Friday, January 1, 202188020000001274900000
Saturday, January 1, 2022106607000001718700000
Sunday, January 1, 2023134224000001909700000
Monday, January 1, 2024137709000002059199999
Loading chart...

Unleashing the power of data

Cost of Revenue Efficiency: A Tale of Two Giants

In the ever-evolving landscape of technology and innovation, ASML Holding N.V. and Palo Alto Networks, Inc. stand as titans in their respective fields. Over the past decade, ASML has demonstrated a remarkable 300% increase in its cost of revenue, reflecting its pivotal role in the semiconductor industry. Meanwhile, Palo Alto Networks, a leader in cybersecurity, has seen its cost of revenue grow by over 1,200%, underscoring its rapid expansion and the increasing demand for digital security.

From 2014 to 2023, ASML's cost of revenue surged from approximately $3.4 billion to $13.4 billion, while Palo Alto Networks climbed from $160 million to nearly $1.9 billion. This stark contrast highlights the differing scales and growth trajectories of these companies. As we look to the future, the missing data for ASML in 2024 leaves room for speculation on its continued growth and market influence.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025