__timestamp | Applied Materials, Inc. | VeriSign, Inc. |
---|---|---|
Wednesday, January 1, 2014 | 5229000000 | 188425000 |
Thursday, January 1, 2015 | 5707000000 | 192788000 |
Friday, January 1, 2016 | 6314000000 | 198242000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2017 | 8005000000 | 193326000 |
Monday, January 1, 2018 | 9436000000 | 192134000 |
Tuesday, January 1, 2019 | 8222000000 | 180467000 |
Wednesday, January 1, 2020 | 9510000000 | 180177000 |
Friday, January 1, 2021 | 12149000000 | 191933000 |
Saturday, January 1, 2022 | 13792000000 | 200700000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2023 | 14133000000 | 197300000 |
Monday, January 1, 2024 | 14279000000 | 191400000 |
Unveiling the hidden dimensions of data
In the ever-evolving landscape of technology, understanding cost efficiency is crucial. Applied Materials, Inc. and VeriSign, Inc. offer a fascinating study in contrasts. From 2014 to 2023, Applied Materials saw a staggering 172% increase in its cost of revenue, peaking at approximately $14.3 billion in 2023. This reflects its expansive growth and investment in production capabilities. In contrast, VeriSign's cost of revenue remained relatively stable, fluctuating around $190 million, with a slight peak in 2022. This stability underscores VeriSign's efficient cost management in maintaining its digital infrastructure.
The data reveals a compelling narrative: while Applied Materials aggressively scales, VeriSign maintains a lean operational model. This comparison not only highlights differing business strategies but also offers insights into how companies can thrive in the competitive tech industry. Missing data for 2024 suggests ongoing developments, inviting further analysis in the coming years.
Cost of Revenue Comparison: Applied Materials, Inc. vs Check Point Software Technologies Ltd.
Comparing Cost of Revenue Efficiency: Applied Materials, Inc. vs Pure Storage, Inc.
Applied Materials, Inc. or VeriSign, Inc.: Who Leads in Yearly Revenue?
Analyzing Cost of Revenue: Applied Materials, Inc. and Zebra Technologies Corporation
Analyzing Cost of Revenue: Applied Materials, Inc. and FLEETCOR Technologies, Inc.
Applied Materials, Inc. vs ASE Technology Holding Co., Ltd.: Efficiency in Cost of Revenue Explored
Cost of Revenue Comparison: Applied Materials, Inc. vs SS&C Technologies Holdings, Inc.
Gross Profit Comparison: Applied Materials, Inc. and VeriSign, Inc. Trends
Cost Insights: Breaking Down Applied Materials, Inc. and Leidos Holdings, Inc.'s Expenses
Research and Development Expenses Breakdown: Applied Materials, Inc. vs VeriSign, Inc.
Operational Costs Compared: SG&A Analysis of Applied Materials, Inc. and VeriSign, Inc.
Comparative EBITDA Analysis: Applied Materials, Inc. vs VeriSign, Inc.