Comparing Cost of Revenue Efficiency: Applied Materials, Inc. vs VeriSign, Inc.

Cost Efficiency: Applied Materials vs. VeriSign

__timestampApplied Materials, Inc.VeriSign, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 20145229000000188425000
Thursday, January 1, 20155707000000192788000
Friday, January 1, 20166314000000198242000
Sunday, January 1, 20178005000000193326000
Monday, January 1, 20189436000000192134000
Tuesday, January 1, 20198222000000180467000
Wednesday, January 1, 20209510000000180177000
Friday, January 1, 202112149000000191933000
Saturday, January 1, 202213792000000200700000
Sunday, January 1, 202314133000000197300000
Monday, January 1, 202414279000000191400000
Loading chart...

Unveiling the hidden dimensions of data

A Tale of Two Companies: Cost of Revenue Efficiency

In the ever-evolving landscape of technology, understanding cost efficiency is crucial. Applied Materials, Inc. and VeriSign, Inc. offer a fascinating study in contrasts. From 2014 to 2023, Applied Materials saw a staggering 172% increase in its cost of revenue, peaking at approximately $14.3 billion in 2023. This reflects its expansive growth and investment in production capabilities. In contrast, VeriSign's cost of revenue remained relatively stable, fluctuating around $190 million, with a slight peak in 2022. This stability underscores VeriSign's efficient cost management in maintaining its digital infrastructure.

The data reveals a compelling narrative: while Applied Materials aggressively scales, VeriSign maintains a lean operational model. This comparison not only highlights differing business strategies but also offers insights into how companies can thrive in the competitive tech industry. Missing data for 2024 suggests ongoing developments, inviting further analysis in the coming years.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025