Comparing Cost of Revenue Efficiency: Analog Devices, Inc. vs Garmin Ltd.

Cost Efficiency Showdown: Analog Devices vs Garmin

__timestampAnalog Devices, Inc.Garmin Ltd.
Wednesday, January 1, 201410345850001266246000
Thursday, January 1, 201511758300001281566000
Friday, January 1, 201611942360001339095000
Sunday, January 1, 201720459070001303840000
Monday, January 1, 201819676400001367725000
Tuesday, January 1, 201919773150001523529000
Wednesday, January 1, 202019125780001705237000
Friday, January 1, 202127932740002092336000
Saturday, January 1, 202244814790002053511000
Sunday, January 1, 202344283210002223297000
Monday, January 1, 202440458140002600348000
Loading chart...

Unleashing the power of data

A Tale of Two Giants: Analog Devices, Inc. vs Garmin Ltd.

In the ever-evolving landscape of technology, cost efficiency is a critical metric for success. Over the past decade, Analog Devices, Inc. and Garmin Ltd. have showcased contrasting trajectories in their cost of revenue. From 2014 to 2023, Analog Devices, Inc. saw a staggering 328% increase in cost efficiency, peaking in 2022 with a 4.48 billion cost of revenue. In contrast, Garmin Ltd. maintained a steadier growth, with a 76% increase over the same period, reaching its highest in 2023. This divergence highlights Analog Devices' aggressive expansion and investment strategies, while Garmin's consistent growth reflects a more stable approach. Notably, 2024 data for Garmin is missing, leaving room for speculation on its future performance. As these industry titans continue to innovate, their cost efficiency will remain a key indicator of their competitive edge.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025