Breaking Down SG&A Expenses: Intuit Inc. vs Monolithic Power Systems, Inc.

Intuit vs. Monolithic Power: SG&A Expense Trends Unveiled

__timestampIntuit Inc.Monolithic Power Systems, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 2014176200000066755000
Thursday, January 1, 2015177100000072312000
Friday, January 1, 2016180700000083012000
Sunday, January 1, 2017197300000097257000
Monday, January 1, 20182298000000113803000
Tuesday, January 1, 20192524000000133542000
Wednesday, January 1, 20202727000000161670000
Friday, January 1, 20213626000000226190000
Saturday, January 1, 20224986000000273595000
Sunday, January 1, 20235062000000275740000
Monday, January 1, 20245730000000
Loading chart...

Cracking the code

A Tale of Two Companies: Intuit Inc. vs. Monolithic Power Systems, Inc.

In the ever-evolving landscape of corporate finance, understanding the nuances of Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial. Over the past decade, Intuit Inc. and Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. have showcased contrasting trajectories in their SG&A expenditures. From 2014 to 2023, Intuit's SG&A expenses surged by over 225%, reflecting its aggressive growth strategy and market expansion. In contrast, Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. experienced a more modest increase of approximately 313%, indicating a steady yet controlled growth approach.

The data reveals that Intuit's SG&A expenses consistently outpaced those of Monolithic Power Systems, Inc., highlighting its larger scale and broader operational scope. However, the absence of data for Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. in 2024 suggests potential reporting delays or strategic shifts. This comparison underscores the diverse strategies companies employ to manage operational costs while navigating the competitive business environment.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025