ASML Holding N.V. and Applied Materials, Inc.: SG&A Spending Patterns Compared

ASML vs. Applied Materials: SG&A Spending Trends Unveiled

__timestampASML Holding N.V.Applied Materials, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 2014318672000890000000
Thursday, January 1, 2015345700000897000000
Friday, January 1, 2016374800000819000000
Sunday, January 1, 2017416600000890000000
Monday, January 1, 20184880000001002000000
Tuesday, January 1, 2019520500000982000000
Wednesday, January 1, 20205449000001093000000
Friday, January 1, 20217256000001229000000
Saturday, January 1, 20229096000001438000000
Sunday, January 1, 202311132000001628000000
Monday, January 1, 202411657000001797000000
Loading chart...

In pursuit of knowledge

SG&A Spending Patterns: ASML vs. Applied Materials

In the competitive landscape of semiconductor manufacturing, understanding the financial strategies of industry leaders is crucial. Over the past decade, ASML Holding N.V. and Applied Materials, Inc. have demonstrated distinct approaches to their Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses. From 2014 to 2023, ASML's SG&A expenses grew by approximately 250%, reflecting a strategic investment in operational expansion. In contrast, Applied Materials saw a 180% increase, indicating a more conservative growth strategy.

A Decade of Financial Strategy

ASML's SG&A expenses surged from 32% of Applied Materials' in 2014 to 68% in 2023, highlighting its aggressive market positioning. Meanwhile, Applied Materials consistently outspent ASML, maintaining a lead in SG&A investments. Notably, 2024 data for ASML is missing, suggesting potential shifts in strategy or reporting. This financial narrative underscores the dynamic strategies of these tech giants in a rapidly evolving industry.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025