Applied Materials, Inc. vs Splunk Inc.: Efficiency in Cost of Revenue Explored

Cost Efficiency: Applied Materials vs. Splunk

__timestampApplied Materials, Inc.Splunk Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 2014522900000035825000
Thursday, January 1, 2015570700000068378000
Friday, January 1, 20166314000000114122000
Sunday, January 1, 20178005000000191053000
Monday, January 1, 20189436000000256409000
Tuesday, January 1, 20198222000000344676000
Wednesday, January 1, 20209510000000429788000
Friday, January 1, 202112149000000547345000
Saturday, January 1, 202213792000000733969000
Sunday, January 1, 202314133000000815995000
Monday, January 1, 202414279000000865507000
Loading chart...

In pursuit of knowledge

Exploring Cost Efficiency: Applied Materials, Inc. vs. Splunk Inc.

In the ever-evolving landscape of technology, cost efficiency remains a pivotal factor for success. This analysis delves into the cost of revenue trends for two industry giants: Applied Materials, Inc. and Splunk Inc., from 2014 to 2024. Over this decade, Applied Materials has demonstrated a robust growth trajectory, with its cost of revenue increasing by approximately 173%, from $5.2 billion in 2014 to an estimated $14.3 billion in 2024. In contrast, Splunk Inc. has shown a more modest rise, with its cost of revenue growing by around 2,316%, from $35.8 million to $865.5 million over the same period. This stark difference highlights the scale and operational dynamics of these companies. As the tech industry continues to expand, understanding these financial nuances is crucial for investors and stakeholders aiming to make informed decisions.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025