Applied Materials, Inc. vs Cadence Design Systems, Inc.: In-Depth EBITDA Performance Comparison

EBITDA Growth: Applied Materials vs. Cadence Design Systems

__timestamp	Applied Materials, Inc.	Cadence Design Systems, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 2014	1939000000	332530000
Thursday, January 1, 2015	2074000000	408806000
Friday, January 1, 2016	2539000000	406544000
Sunday, January 1, 2017	4343000000	448885000
Monday, January 1, 2018	4953000000	526019000
Tuesday, January 1, 2019	3735000000	620586000
Wednesday, January 1, 2020	4844000000	799150000
Friday, January 1, 2021	7594000000	927723000
Saturday, January 1, 2022	8228000000	1200385000
Sunday, January 1, 2023	8169000000	1419630000
Monday, January 1, 2024	8259000000	1350763000

Cracking the code

A Decade of EBITDA Growth: Applied Materials vs. Cadence Design Systems

In the ever-evolving semiconductor industry, Applied Materials, Inc. and Cadence Design Systems, Inc. have showcased remarkable EBITDA growth over the past decade. From 2014 to 2023, Applied Materials experienced a staggering 323% increase in EBITDA, peaking in 2023 with a 8.2 billion USD equivalent. Meanwhile, Cadence Design Systems demonstrated a robust 327% growth, reaching its highest EBITDA in 2023 at approximately 1.4 billion USD.

Key Insights

Applied Materials: The company saw a significant surge in EBITDA, particularly from 2017 onwards, reflecting its strategic advancements in semiconductor manufacturing technology.
Cadence Design Systems: Despite being smaller in scale, Cadence's consistent growth highlights its pivotal role in electronic design automation.

The data for 2024 is incomplete, indicating potential for further analysis. This comparison underscores the dynamic nature of the semiconductor sector and the strategic maneuvers of these industry giants.

Published by

U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link

sec.gov

Date published

28 Jan 2025

Similar Statistics

Applied Materials, Inc. vs Cadence Design Systems, Inc.: Examining Key Revenue Metrics

Analyzing Cost of Revenue: Applied Materials, Inc. and Cadence Design Systems, Inc.

Gross Profit Trends Compared: Applied Materials, Inc. vs Cadence Design Systems, Inc.

Applied Materials, Inc. vs Cadence Design Systems, Inc.: Strategic Focus on R&D Spending

Comparative EBITDA Analysis: Applied Materials, Inc. vs Amphenol Corporation

EBITDA Analysis: Evaluating Applied Materials, Inc. Against Intel Corporation

A Professional Review of EBITDA: Applied Materials, Inc. Compared to KLA Corporation

Applied Materials, Inc. and Cadence Design Systems, Inc.: SG&A Spending Patterns Compared

Professional EBITDA Benchmarking: Applied Materials, Inc. vs Infosys Limited

Professional EBITDA Benchmarking: Applied Materials, Inc. vs Synopsys, Inc.

A Professional Review of EBITDA: Applied Materials, Inc. Compared to Fortinet, Inc.

Applied Materials, Inc. and Dell Technologies Inc.: A Detailed Examination of EBITDA Performance