Analyzing Cost of Revenue: Broadcom Inc. and Pure Storage, Inc.

Broadcom vs. Pure Storage: A Decade of Revenue Costs

__timestampBroadcom Inc.Pure Storage, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 2014239200000024129000
Thursday, January 1, 2015327100000077552000
Friday, January 1, 20167300000000167893000
Sunday, January 1, 20179127000000252279000
Monday, January 1, 201810115000000353781000
Tuesday, January 1, 201910114000000457528000
Wednesday, January 1, 202010372000000509886000
Friday, January 1, 202110606000000535255000
Saturday, January 1, 202211108000000708329000
Sunday, January 1, 202311129000000855788000
Monday, January 1, 202419065000000809430000
Loading chart...

Igniting the spark of knowledge

Analyzing Cost of Revenue: Broadcom Inc. vs. Pure Storage, Inc.

In the ever-evolving tech industry, understanding the cost of revenue is crucial for evaluating a company's financial health. Broadcom Inc. and Pure Storage, Inc., two giants in the semiconductor and data storage sectors, have shown contrasting trends over the past decade. From 2014 to 2024, Broadcom's cost of revenue surged by approximately 700%, reflecting its aggressive expansion and market dominance. In contrast, Pure Storage experienced a more modest increase of around 3,250%, indicative of its rapid growth phase as a newer player in the market.

Key Insights

  • Broadcom Inc.: By 2024, Broadcom's cost of revenue reached nearly $19 billion, highlighting its substantial operational scale.
  • Pure Storage, Inc.: Despite a smaller base, Pure Storage's cost of revenue grew significantly, reaching over $800 million by 2024, showcasing its expanding footprint in the data storage industry.

These trends underscore the dynamic nature of the tech industry, where established giants and emerging innovators continuously reshape the landscape.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025