Analog Devices, Inc. or Keysight Technologies, Inc.: Who Manages SG&A Costs Better?

SG&A Cost Management: Analog Devices vs. Keysight Technologies

__timestampAnalog Devices, Inc.Keysight Technologies, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 2014454676000790000000
Thursday, January 1, 2015478972000793000000
Friday, January 1, 2016461438000818000000
Sunday, January 1, 20176910460001049000000
Monday, January 1, 20186959370001205000000
Tuesday, January 1, 20196480940001155000000
Wednesday, January 1, 20206599230001097000000
Friday, January 1, 20219154180001195000000
Saturday, January 1, 202212661750001283000000
Sunday, January 1, 202312735840001307000000
Monday, January 1, 202410686400001395000000
Loading chart...

In pursuit of knowledge

Who Manages SG&A Costs Better: Analog Devices or Keysight Technologies?

In the competitive landscape of technology companies, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for maintaining profitability. From 2014 to 2024, Analog Devices, Inc. and Keysight Technologies, Inc. have shown distinct strategies in handling these costs.

Analog Devices started with lower SG&A expenses in 2014, around 57% of Keysight's. However, by 2023, their expenses surged by approximately 180%, reaching nearly 98% of Keysight's. This indicates a significant increase in their operational costs over the decade.

Conversely, Keysight Technologies maintained a more consistent growth in SG&A expenses, with a 65% increase from 2014 to 2024. Their strategic cost management has allowed them to keep expenses relatively stable, despite the industry's rapid evolution.

This analysis highlights the importance of strategic cost management in sustaining competitive advantage in the tech industry.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025