A Side-by-Side Analysis of EBITDA: Lam Research Corporation and Cadence Design Systems, Inc.

EBITDA Growth: Lam Research vs. Cadence Design Systems

__timestampCadence Design Systems, Inc.Lam Research Corporation
Wednesday, January 1, 2014332530000977923000
Thursday, January 1, 20154088060001155224000
Friday, January 1, 20164065440001365284000
Sunday, January 1, 20174488850002218837000
Monday, January 1, 20185260190003539694000
Tuesday, January 1, 20196205860002774013000
Wednesday, January 1, 20207991500002942327000
Friday, January 1, 20219277230004789174000
Saturday, January 1, 202212003850005715561000
Sunday, January 1, 202314196300005637608000
Monday, January 1, 202413507630004905157000
Loading chart...

Data in motion

A Comparative Journey of EBITDA Growth: Lam Research vs. Cadence Design Systems

In the ever-evolving landscape of semiconductor and electronic design automation, Lam Research Corporation and Cadence Design Systems, Inc. have emerged as industry stalwarts. Over the past decade, from 2014 to 2023, these companies have demonstrated remarkable growth in their EBITDA, a key indicator of financial health and operational efficiency.

Lam Research has consistently outperformed, with its EBITDA soaring by approximately 476% from 2014 to 2023. This growth underscores its strategic prowess in the semiconductor equipment sector. Meanwhile, Cadence Design Systems has also shown impressive progress, with a 327% increase in EBITDA over the same period, reflecting its stronghold in the software and design automation market.

While Lam Research's EBITDA peaked in 2022, Cadence Design Systems continued its upward trajectory into 2023. Notably, data for 2024 is incomplete, leaving room for speculation on future trends.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025